Saturday, April 28, 2012

 

What A Joke: The Politics of Comedy


Originally published by The Daily, April 28, 2012

Comedy matters in our political life – and it should respect no sacred cows
  • Image
    PHOTO:Martin H. Simon/Landov 
In 2012, at the intersection of comedy and politics, one is just as likely to find a punching bag as a punch line. Just ask Jimmy Kimmel, who headlines tonight’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

The ABC late-night host made the critical error Wednesday, telling Reuters that “it’s hard to make fun of Obama in general because he’s a cool character. Outside of his ears, there’s not a whole lot.”

Given that attitude, one assumes that much of the political humor at what has come to be known as Washington, D.C.’s annual “Nerd Prom” will be at the expense of — surprise! — Republicans (and conservatives)! Sure enough, in the same interview, Kimmel previewed six jokes about GOPers, including favorite whipping girl Sarah Palin (who didn’t run this year) and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (hardly a household name).

Ideology aside, Kimmel arguably broke a cardinal rule of comedy: There can be no sacred cows. If certain public figures are seen as “cool,” that should be all the more reason to double up and find ways to poke fun at them.

Besides, despite President Obama’s “slow-jamming” the news Tuesday night with Kimmel’s NBC late-night rival Jimmy Fallon, it’s hard to give the POTUS a pass on the “coolness” factor. Has Kimmel so soon forgotten the image of Obama throwing out the first pitch at the 2009 All-Star Game wearing — gasp! — “mom jeans”!?!

Or how about his urging young urban men to “pull up their pants”?

Cool? Well, in a Cliff Huxtable sort of way (a comparison “Saturday Night Live” noted earlier this year).

Even if a comic agrees with a president ideologically, he can’t let that get in the way of giving the appropriate mocking that all in power deserve. Last year, Kimmel’s WHCD predecessor, Seth Meyers — head writer on “SNL” — figured this out: “You know who could beat Obama in 2012? Obama from 2008,” he said, turning to Obama on the dais. “You would love him.” Without being insulting, Meyers wittily expressed the frustrations of many Americans.
Jimmy K., take note.

But does any of this really matter in the end? After all, it’s just comedy, right? Must we take it so seriously?

Oh, most definitely.

More than ever before, comedy is a valuable tool in the political and cultural message wars. Obama used his “stand-up” turn at 2011’s WHCD to simultaneously humiliate Donald Trump and essentially destroy the “birther” meme.

More significantly, Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert have turned the art of political comedy and satire into a force independent of the traditional news media — yet able nonetheless to influence it. In our post-modern century, many young people now only learn about a political issue after Stewart and Colbert have mocked it. Stewart often uses his “Daily Show” platform to deconstruct political narratives — and then engages in serious debate with his conservative frenemy Bill O’Reilly on the latter’s talk show.

Colbert launched his own “super PAC” — Americans For A Better Tomorrow Tomorrow — to mock the big-money nature of politics.

From the conservative standpoint, Rush Limbaugh’s success for two decades stems from his use of a tactic similar to Stewart and Colbert: being knowledgeable enough about politics and policy so he can effectively skewer the pre- and mis-conceptions of the mainstream media.

But this approach has limits, as seen in the uproar over Limbaugh’s “prostitute” comments about Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke during the birth-control funding debate. Limbaugh was forced to apologize and (temporarily) lost some advertisers.

But the fallout in the broader comedy-political world couldn’t be ignored. Once Limbaugh was chastened, a pound of flesh had to be taken elsewhere. And so, liberal-ish Louis CK’s decidedly non-PC jokes about women caused enough controversy that he withdrew as the entertainment for the Radio & TV Correspondent’s Dinner (the WHCD’s less glamorous cousin). Liberal comedian Bill Maher came under plenty of fire as well.

All of this exposes an obvious reality: While conservatives have long dominated talk radio, liberals have had the upper hand in the comedy part of popular culture. Kimmel’s implicit kowtowing to Obama just highlights that.

So hungry are conservatives for an alternative to the Stewart/Colbert hegemony that many can be found still up as late as 3 a.m. EST weeknights to tune into the sardonic libertarian mockery of Fox News Channel’s “Red Eye.” (Fox shares a parent company with The Daily.)

Eschewing the “fake news” approach of Stewart and Colbert, host Greg Gutfeld, sidekick Andy Levy and rotating guests take snarky approaches to politics and current events. Levy quickly noted after Kimmel’s comment about Obama that a “cool” president wouldn’t raid marijuana dispensaries or still be “evolving” on gay marriage. (Full disclosure: This author has appeared on “Red Eye.”)

In addition to “Red Eye” — and conservative humor sites like Iowahawk and Duh Progressive — a handful of “SNL” veterans in recent years have “come out of the closet” as conservatives (or at least non-liberal). They include Victoria Jackson, now a tea party activist; Dennis Miller, now a radio host; and, arguably, anti-liberals Norm MacDonald and Colin Quinn. And this week, an audio clip of Jon Lovitz profanely slamming Obama over his soak-the-rich policies went viral.

Regardless of who headlines the “Nerd Prom” each year, clearly one major “benefit” of America’s currently polarized politics is humor and mockery coming from more directions than ever before.
That’s definitely something worth smiling about.

Robert A. George is a New York Post editorial writer and occasional stand-up comic.

Labels: , , ,


Bookmark and Share
|

Monday, May 02, 2011

 

Killing On Stage -- And Off

What a difference a day can make.

A world in which Osama bin Laden is no longer alive is a very different one than 24, 48 or 72 hours before. However, the change felt today because of the news delivered yesterday evening should force a rapid re-think of what occurred over the last few days.

On Saturday evening, like many other journalists, I was in Washington, DC, at the White House Correspondents Dinner.  As several people recalled last night, comedian Seth Meyers made an Osama bin Laden joke (the last in a series about not many people watching C-SPAN: "We're still looking for Osama bin Laden; but how many people know that every day he hosts a show at 4 PM on C-SPAN").  The (yes) C-SPAN camera caught President Obama reacting to the joke. This was one day after he had approved the operation to take out bin Laden. 

Seeing that picture reminded me of something. As I mentioned to a couple friends post-dinner, the president seemed a little "off" in his comedic remarks. Not that they weren't funny; they were (his take out of Donald Trump was done quite well, but the "Lion King" "live video of my birth" killed).  However, I've seen Obama several times do these kind of stand-up gigs and, previously, there was always an endearing "tic" in his performances:  After a particularly amusing line, he would pause and laugh at his own joke -- almost as if he were hearing it for the first time (which might have been the case).  In fact, I've mentioned this before.  In any event, that tic wasn't there Saturday.  He was just locked in to deliver his jokes with a surgical efficiency.  I just put it down to the fact that he was still pissed off over the whole birth certificate issue from the previous few days. He had looked more than a bit petulant at the "birth" presser on Thursday (the 28th).

Of course, now everyone knows that that the OBL mission was coming to a head throughout last week. The ultimate meeting of the national security council OBL team was that same Thursday -- presumably right before the birther-presser, because he headed off to Chicago for a seeming awkwardly-timed Oprah appearance. Yeah, that one, right after he said, "We’ve got better stuff to do.  I’ve got better stuff to do.  We’ve got big problems to solve.  And I’m confident we can solve them, but we’re going to have to focus on them — not on this." 

Again, now we know that it wasn't the economy and the budget and awful weather down South that were the "big problems" Obama was thinking about while lashing "carnival barkers" and the media. It was bin Laden. And, yeah, he knew he had to "perform" in front of the press on Saturday, but he couldn't let anything slip as to what was really going on. So, his focus caused his comedic "tell" to disappear. It's quite possible he concentrated on the "performance" a bit more this year, just because there were so many weighty matters on his mind.   

And that weight carries on from here.

Getting Osama bin Laden is a great military and intelligence achievement. As the spontaneous celebrations that emerged at Ground Zero, outside the White House and around the country show, this was also a much-needed emotional catharsis for the entire country (but, darn it, did we have to bury the body at sea so quick? Cue mics for those who now think bin Laden wasn't really killed). One is tempted to use Gerald Ford's line, delivered in a very different context: "Our long national nightmare is over,"  though the 9/11 hangover has lasted twice the time Watergate did.  However, the president disabused Americans of that temptations in his address Sunday night: "Yet [bin Laden's] death does not mark the end of our effort. There’s no doubt that al Qaeda will continue to pursue attacks against us. We must –- and we will -- remain vigilant at home and abroad."

But the dynamics of the effort are changed.  Al Qaeda Prime is now leaderless and there will be inevitably a struggle for who gets to run the terror network -- and those wouldbe bin Ladens may try to outdo one another in producing the most impressive strike against the West.  However, is it merely coincidence that OBL was taken out one day after NATO targeted Moammar Khadafy's Tripoli compound (and reportedly killed members of his family)?  What message does the OBL takeout send to Khadafy? Is he more likely to sue for peace -- and forced retirement? On the other hand, what are the Libyan rebel forces -- who are believed to have strong connections to al Qaeda's North African franchise -- thinking?  Will they get the lesson that -- even if they evict Khadafy -- it might be beneficial to have good relations with the United States.  At least for a while. 

Does this mean that Obama can now actually fulfill his promise of beginning the Afghanistan drawdown this summer?  Everyone presumed that the July deadline was going to be "honored" in the breach. Now, does the US cut a deal with the Taliban and then actually start moving out. If so, wither Hamid Karzai? 

Lots of questions to resolve. But this is a real "game changer, that puts President Obama in an enviable position.  It does not guarantee his reelection, contrary to what some in Twitterland proclaimed. George H.W. Bush hovered around 90 percent approval after the end of Gulf War I.  He was turned out of office with 38 percent 18 months later. That said, Obama undoubtedly gets a few days new honeymoon after this great "get." He further buys himself more time to look like a unifying non-political figure -- regardless where gas prices might be. He can then try praying that the economy and jobs market start picking up. If they don't, he'll be toast -- just like the elder Bush. 

But, those concerns aside, if Republicans weren't worrying before, they should now -- not for policy reasons, but for political ones. The first GOP debate is just days away. The field is still unsettled -- and now the debate will be held in the wake of this great accomplishment in the war on terror (or whatever it has now been renamed). The optics don't look good for the GOP.  But more importantly -- drawing the exact opposite conclusion I did a couple days ago -- it's the Republican base that should worry about its political arm. In barely three days, Barack Obama has gone from seeming to be on the defensive in releasing his birth certificate to looking like he has the deadliest poker face outside of Las Vegas.  Not only did Obama school Donald Trump -- at both the press conference and the Correspondents Dinner -- but it's so obvious now that he was juggling some very serious things while appearing to look dithering and superficial. 

Leading from behind, anyone?  

The GOP is dealing with a man who has pure ice in his veins.  Someone who gives neither media nor opposition any hint at the cards he has yet to play. Oh, and he may raise $1 billion for his re-election campaign.  This combination should make Republican partisans very nervous. 

What a difference a few days can make. 

Labels: , , ,


Bookmark and Share
|

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

 

(P)Syke(s)!

Kathleen Parker basically hits the nail on the head on the pseudo-controversy involving comic Wanda Sykes at the White House Correspondents Dinner last weekend:

There's nothing un-funnier than Saturday night's jokes reviewed by the caffeinated light of Monday morning.

Which is why we probably shouldn't quarterback a comedian over coffee when she was performing for a crowd primed on cocktails.

Exactly.

Parker is also pretty spot on in explaining why Sykes' stuff on Rush Limbaugh wasn't funny (whereas the president's -- "Sorry, RNC, Rush Limbaugh does not qualify as a troubled asset." -- was).

Sykes' Limbaugh joke was not funny for the reason she cites -- plus the fact that it was too complicated. For a political joke you want a sentence or two of set-up and then -- BAM! -- a punch line. Trying to thread together "hoping Obama fails" to "country failing" to "treason" to "20th hijacker" is just too complicated -- even in a room of political junkies.

I do disagree with Parker in one respect -- that "No one's drug addiction is amusing." Au contraire! One's own addiction isn't funny -- someone else's is. Well, at least a few degrees of separation away. Addiction of a close family member absolutely sucks. But, sorry, addiction problems of the wealthy or otherwise high-and-mighty can be a source of much humor.

Keith Richards' blood transfusions. Any member of the Kennedys. Britney Spears. It's not nice, but it is part of the human condition: We are wired to experience schaedenfreude of the misfortunes of those who are materially or status-wise "better" than us -- yet who nonetheless fall prey to various temptations.

Mocking celebrity addiction is a humor stock-in-trade going back to Aristophanes when royalty were the only "celebrities" to make fun of.

Labels: , ,


Bookmark and Share
|

Monday, April 23, 2007

 

RAGGED Weekend, Pt. 2: WHCA

After croquet, your RT correspondent headed west on Route 50 for the White House Correspondents Association annual bash. Some juicy items can be found in this Washington Post report.

Here's some flavor, courtesy of your RT correspondent.



This is the lovely -- though blatantly liberal -- actress Kerry Washington. She portrayed Ray Charles' wife Della Bea Robinson in Ray. Ironically, she plays blind sculptress Alicia Masters, love interest of The Thing in the next Fantastic Four movie. She's pictured with Chicago Tribune columnist Clarence Page and his wife Lisa.


Desperate Housewife Teri Hatcher was busy making the rounds: The guy with his back to the camera is American Idol castoff Chris Sligh.



A number of people seemed to want to get their picture taken with this young man with the unusual hair style, but I'm not sure what the big deal was.


Now, I was sitting at the table right next to the guy in this picture. There seemed to be a parade of females of various ages coming up to get their picture taken -- including the aforementioned Teri Hatcher who made sure that she got a photo with him before she walked over to the dais to chat up the president of the United States! Who is the lucky young fellow? His name is Zac Effron, star of Disney's High School Musical. He is apparently the bees knees with the pre-teen set -- and others.



On-screen, the principal "entertainment" of the evening, Rich Little. This relic of the '70s was brought in because of the controversy that erupted
over Stephen Colbert last year. The WHCA wanted someone who wouldn't be too edgy or potentially offensive to the president. Well, they got that from Little. They also got someone who created bipartisan agreement from the crowd: Republicans, Democrats, conservatives, liberals, moderates, etc., all agreed that Little was awful. There may have been one joke that couldn't have been delivered 15 years ago, but that was about it.

As one wag put it at the end of Little's routine (which, of course, was a Richard Nixon impression), "Our long national nightmare is over." That wag, of course, was yours truly.

On the other hand, David Letterman's "Top Ten George W. Bush Moments" -- a compendium of malapropisms and faux pas -- was rather amusing. That's available here:




Is this the eventual GOP presidential nominee? Could be. After all, Republican Arthur Branch managed to be elected district attorney in heavily Democratic Manhattan, so the sky's the limit!


Protestors outside the Washington Hilton (where the WHCA dinner is held every year) are clearly confused: The media doesn't "buy" Bush's war. We sell it. There is a crucial difference.


Heading to the afterparty are Bloomberg administration Deputy Mayor and political capo Kevin Sheeky, Chris Taylor, Jessica Loeser, Bloomberg Press Secretary Stu Loeser.



The Bloomberg Party.


Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY), a candidate for New York City mayor in 2009, holds court.

Labels: ,


Bookmark and Share
|

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Google
Web raggedthots.blogspot.com
Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Technorati search
Search Now:
Amazon Logo
  •  RSS
  • Add to My AOL
  • Powered by FeedBurner
  • Add to Google Reader or Homepage
  • Subscribe in Bloglines
  • Share on Facebook